Comparison of Limberg Flap with Karydakis Repair in Pilonidal Sinus Disease

Authors

  • Adeel Riaz, Ammarah Afzal and Muhammad Akram Dogar Author

Abstract

Objective: To compare Limberg flap with Karydakis repair in pilonidal sinus disease in terms of operative time and 
post-operative complications. 
Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. 
Place and Duration of Study: This study was conducted at the Department of General Surgery, Central Park 
Teaching Hospital, Lahore from July 2016 to June 2017. 
Materials and Methods: A total of 204 patients who underwent surgery for pilonidal sinus diseasewere included. 
Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups of n patients each by lottery method. Patients in Group L 
underwent surgery via the Limberg flap technique while patients in Group K were managed by the Karydakis repair 
technique. Both groups were then compared in terms of mean operative time, VAS pain score, postoperative 
complications and recurrence rates. 
Results: The mean operation time was 50.59±9.1 minutes in Group L versus 41.04±8.63 minutes in Group K, which 
was statistically significant (p˂0.001).The mean VAS pain score was 2.51±1.16 in Group L versus 3.19±1.45 in 
Group K, which was also statistically significant (p˂0.001). The difference in frequency of overall complications 
(p=0.391) and the recurrence rate (p=0.268) was statistically was non-significant. 
Conclusion: Karydakis repair is the better technique in terms of having lesser operation time and lesser frequency of 
wound dehiscence while Limberg flap technique is associated with lesser post-operative pain. 

Downloads

Published

2024-10-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Comparison of Limberg Flap with Karydakis Repair in Pilonidal Sinus Disease . (2024). Medical Forum Monthly, 30(10). https://medicalforummonthly.com/index.php/mfm/article/view/4952