Restorative Material of Choice for A Moderately Sized Class I Cavity in a Lower Permanent Molar

Abstract

Objective: To study dentist related factors affecting  choice of restorative material in a moderately sized, simple class I cavity on a permanent molar.

Study Design: Cross sectional / descriptive study

Place and Duration of the Study: This study was carried out at Jinnah Medical and Dental College between February 2015 to July 2015

Materials and Methods: Dentists from public and private sectors were requested to respond to a self administered questionnaire regarding their choice of restorative material for a moderately sized class I cavity in a permanent molar.

Results: 66%, 54% and 16% of the dentists graduating in the years 2011-2015, 2006-2010 and 2001-2005 respectively chose amalgam. Whereas, 31%, 35% and &73% graduating in the same years preferred composite. 38% of the dentists practicing privately and 69% of dentists working in institutional setup selected amalgam.66% of female dentists selected amalgam and 30% chose composite. In contrast, 43% of male dentist selected composite and 44% chose amalgam.

Conclusion: The dependable blend of enduring service of amalgam with its cost effectiveness makes amalgam a better choice for posterior teeth in our settings. (Pakistan)